Player Freedom vs. Narrative Cohesion

Having recently played the Heavy Rain demo, Batman: Arkham Asylum, and Uncharted 2, I’ve been thinking about linearity in video games and the impact on game play and narrative. As I have already written a piece on the subject, this is more of an addendum.

I have come up with a Theory of Player Freedom vs. Narrative Cohesion (working title): The scope of a player’s freedom to explore a game world and choose courses of action is inversely proportional to the cohesiveness of any overarching narrative structure.

Example #1: Oblivion (The Elder Scrolls IV) – A vast open world where the player might have ten or more open quests at any one time. The player is free to follow the main storyline or simply wander off to muck about in a dungeon. The impact to the narrative is that, though the immediate fate of the kingdom depends on you having a conversation with the captain of the guard, you can go off adventuring for weeks of game time and return to the castle to find the captain waiting for you as though only moments had passed. The credibility of the narrative is sacrificed somewhat in order to grant the freedom of an open world.

Example #2: Uncharted 2 – Were one to take the 3D mesh of any level of the game, remove all of the textures and objects, and stand it on its side like a big grey unpainted diorama, you could drop a ball from the top opening (the start of the level), and it would fall, rolling and bouncing, all the way through to the bottom opening (the level’s end). There is a single correct path through the entire structure. Yet, because of this, the designers have tighter control over the narrative’s choreography, which, in this case, is masterful.

Because Uncharted 2 is so well constructed and so well presented, I didn’t mind that I did not have as much freedom to explore or solve problems. Had the writing or the production quality been sub-par, I would not have finished the game.

Batman: Arkham Asylum is balanced between these examples. The next objective is always clear and the narrative always supports it. But you are always free to explore Arkham island, pursuing other challenges. The narrative always channels you in a particular direction, but the architecture of the game rarely shifts in such a way that you have no choice but to move forward. Also, within each stage of the game, you have multiple vectors of approach to solve various dilemmas.

Giving the player much more agency over how they will use their gadgets and skills creates a stronger connection to actually being Batman. In Uncharted, I always felt like I was watching Drake do his thing; I never became Drake.

I will approach the full version of Heavy Rain with a cautious optimism. If my theory holds up, what promises to be a very controlled, linear “game” may offer a spectacular narrative experience.

One Comment on "Player Freedom vs. Narrative Cohesion"

  1. Echo says:

    Though I haven’t given it anywhere near this kind of thought, I agree with you. Another type of game is the type that has attempted to map a myriad of player choices into separate and distinct narratives. This, when well done, has phenomenal replay value; you need to go back and reply time after time to find out what happens when you make different choices.

    This seems like such a good idea, and yet I often find myself shying away from such games. Once I have felt the tension of the narrative and lived through its resolution, I don’t necessarily WANT to experience it again. I want to move on. I want to find a new narrative. I’m not a big re-reader of books either :-p.

    Therefore, I tend to lean toward games that either have very shallow narratives and infinite freedom or games that are completely linear. I can play Oblivion until I get tired of it, and I don’t have to feel as if I missed anything of importance in the narrative, even if I only explored a small fraction of my choices. OTOH, in a game like the Final Fantasy series, I’m perfectly fine with viewing it as a series of puzzles or quests rewarded by the next installment of a compelling story. What I don’t want to face is the regret of my choices when I don’t have the attention span to go play over again.

Got something to say? Go for it!

Since administration was continued through the first day of their period, the total number of days this decoction was administered each cycle was 15, and one course of treatment equaled three months. Jude medical announces launch of the viewmate z intracardiac ultrasound system and viewflex plus ice catheter ge healthcare presents flutemetamol data for detection of amyloid plaque linked to alzheimer's disease ahra and toshiba announce 2010 putting patients first grant recipients research and markets: u. viagra 5 mg directions Alternatively, pro-forma payment can be made by bank transfer. Otherwise, a hysterectomy can still be performed. Pathology study tracks uterine changes with mifepristone... first time viagra users Health officials enlist police in growing meningitis scare serb lawmaker accused of corruption stripped of immunity senator works on tighter u. Drew tortoriello – new york infertility insights dr. Lipman is wonderful. In addition, patients with submucosal fibroids are not good candidates for this procedure, since treatment failure is high and there is some risk of developing a serious infection. On the basis of these findings, the authors concluded that reducing fibroid vascularity by pre-procedural gnrh-agonist therapy may enhance the thermoablative effect of mrgfus, resulting in a greater clinical response to treatment (smart et al. Fibroid-related menorrhagia: treatment with superselective embolization of the uterine arteries and midterm follow-up. viagra 100mg street value Prevalence of uterine fibroids twenty to 40 percent of women age 35 and older have uterine fibroids of a significant size.